華語文教學研究所
科目名稱: 語用學
學
分:
選修、
3 學分
時
間:
教
室:
授課教師: 鄧守信
===============================================================
課程內容:
Topics:
1. Understanding pragmatics (Grundy #l)
2. Speech acts (Grundy @3)
3. Functions of deixis(Grnndy @2, Teng 1981)
4. Presupposition (Grundy #6)
5. Conversational implicature (Grundy #4)
6. Cooperative principle (Grice 1975)
7. Politeness principle and strategies (Leech 1983, Grundy @7)
8. Relevance theory (Grundy #5)
9. Speech events (Grundy @8)
10. Meta-functions (Grundy @10)
11. Scalar implicature (Hirschber 1985, Schwenter 2001)
12. Various readings on Chinese pragmatic structures (reports & discussions)
Bibliography
General
Davis, Steven. 1991. Pragmatics: A Reader Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Grice, Paul. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech
Act, ed. P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41-58. NY Academic Press.
Grundy, Peter. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. NY: Oxford University Press.
Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. a theory of scalar implicature. Ph.D dissertation.
University of Pennsylvania.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv, eds. 1998. Discourse Markers.
Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. The printicples of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge & New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Rouchota, Villy and A. Jucker, eds. 1998. Current Issues in Relevance
Theory. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamin's.
Schwenter, Scott. 2001. additive particles and scalar endpoint
marking. Particles Conference, Brussels, Dec. 2000.
Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London & New York:Long man
On Chinese
Biq, Yung-O. 1984. Indirect speech acts in Chinese polite expressions.
JCLTA 1984.19.3.1-10
Biq, Yung-O. 1990. Question words as hedges in conversational Chinese:
A Q and R exercise. Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series vol.
I, ed. by Lawrence B. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru, 141-157. Urbana-Champaign: University
of Illinois.
Biq, Yung-O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun
in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 307-321.
Biq, Yung-O. 1999. Talking metalingually: Meaning negotiation in
Mandarin conversation. Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interactions in
Language, Y. Yin, 1. Yang, & H. Chan (eds.), 503-548. Taipei: Institute
of Linguistics, Academia Chui, Kawai. 2000. Ritualization in evolving pragmatic
functions: A case study ofdui. IsCLL 7: 177-192.
Chang, Hui-Ching, & G Richard Holts. 1994. Debt-repaying mechanism
in Chinese relationships: An exploration of the folk concepts of pao and human
emotional debt. Research on Language and Social Interaction 27.4: 351-387.
Chang, Miao-Hsia. 1998. The discourse functions ofTaiwanese
kong in relation to its grammaticalization. In S. Huang (ed.). Selected Papers
from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, 111-127. Taipei:
Crane.
Chen, Rong. 1993. Responding to compliments: A contrastive study
of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal
of Pragmatics 20:49-75.
Chen, Victoria. 1990/91. Mien tze at the Chinese dinner table: A study
of the interactional accomplishment efface. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 24:109-140.
Chu, Chauncey C. 2002. Relevance Theory, Discourse Markers and
the Mandarin Utterance-Final Particle A/Ya (Ms)
Huang, Yan. 1991. Aneo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal
of Linguistics 27:301-335.
Li, Cherry Ing. 2001. Minimization, conversational inference, and grammaticalization
in Taiwanese Southern Min. Proceedings of the Symposium on Selected NSC Projects
in General Linguistics from 1998-2000: 311-331. Taipei: NTU Institute of Linguistics.
Li, Ing Cherry 李櫻 1999. Utterance-Final Particles in Taiwanese:
A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Li, Wendan. 2000. The pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers
in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1113-1133.
Liao, C.C.(廖招治) and Mary L. Bresnahan.(1996). A Contrastive Pragmatic
Study of American English and Mandarin Refusal strategies. Language Science
18, 3&4:703-727
Mao, LuMing Robert. 1994. Beyond politeness theory: Tace* revisited
and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451-486.
Shie,Chi-chiang (解志強) 1991 ADiscourse-Functional Analysis of Mandarin Sentence-Final
Particles. 國語句尾質詞之交談功能分析。 Taipei: National Chengchi University M.A. thesis.
Teng, Shouhsin. 1981. Deixis, anaphora and demonstratives in Chinese.
Cahiers de Linguistique asie Orientale 10.5-18 (Paris)
Wang, Yu-fang, Aya Katz, & Chih-hua Chen. 2000. From "prepositional"
to "expressive" meanings - Shuo in Chinese BBS talk and conversation
produced by young people in Taiwan. IsCLL 7:193-212. 26:423-458
朱惠美 1995•人際親疏關係如何影響拒絕模式 。台北市立師範學院學報 26:423-458
李櫻.2000.漢語研究中的語用面向•漢學研究第十 人卷特刊
李櫻,陳秋梅,& 林敏靜 [Li,IngCherry,Chiou-mei Chen & Min-jin Lin]. 1998. 台灣閩南語言談標記
試析 [ A preliminary study on the Taiwanese discourse marker a]. In S. Huang
(ed.), Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages
in Taiwan, 151-166. Taipei: Crane.
施玉惠.1988. ConversationalPolitenessandForeignLanguageTeaching,iaiwan TheCrane
Publishing Co.
詹惠珍.2000.」缸 漢學研究第十八卷特刊, 299-322.
崔希亮.1993.漢語連字句的語用研究.申國語文 2.117-125.